Late payment of commercial debts calculator
Interest & compensation
Information in tinted fields is
required. The program tries to calculate as you go along:
it should flag suggested values in this colour .
Hitting the [SHOW CALCULATION...] button gives
explanations and displays the interest calculation in a pop-up
window (if your web browser program allows it to do all that).
Union members having difficulty persuading a client to
pay up should see the Collect-o-matic!
Really detailed contracts specify a "jurisdiction" - the country
where you agree to go to court. This also decides whether you can claim
interest and debt recovery cost compensation, and how much. As a rule of
thumb, unless otherwise specified in a contract the jurisdiction is the
country your client operates in.
Note: We have yet to confirm the interest rate applied by
Germany and that it has in fact implemented the €40
compensation that the 2011 EU Directive mandates.
Under EU regulations updated with effect from 16 March 2013,
by default payment is due 30 days after:
whichever is the later (see examples).
- your client became aware of how much they owed you,
- you delivered or did the work, or
- any "procedure of acceptance or verification" of the work that is specified in the contract is complete (see note 3),
If payment is delayed beyond this date, interest is payable at a penalty rate, plus compensation for debt recovery costs.
After filling in the relevant dates and amounts, click [SHOW CALCULATION...]
to get a detailed account of the interest and compensation, and see any error messages.
- The 30-day rule is overriden if you agreed a different due date when you took the work on.
- If your client is a public body, it should not let the clock tick for more than 30 days.
- If your client is not a public body, and if you made a contract with it on or after 16 March 2013, it can ask you to agree to be paid later - after up to 60 days of clock-ticking. In fact it can ask you to agree to even later payment - but this must not be "grossly unfair".
- If you agreed your contract on or after 16 March 2013, and if your actual costs in recovering the money are greater than the statutory minimim compensation, you can claim your total actual costs.
For clarity, we repeat: unless you explicitly agree otherwise, payment is still due 30 days after the clock starts ticking.
The regulations authorise your union to act on your behalf against clients that try to impose
contracts that are "grossly unfair" or circumvent the penalties. If you are an NUJ member
and think you have been "offered" such a contract, contact the
From 16 March 2013 minimum compensation of €40 applies in all EU member states, on top of the penalty interest. The minima are higher in the UK, and in Ireland when the amount due is greater than €1000.
If you agreed your contract on or after 16 March 2013, your client can ask in it for a "procedure of acceptance or verification". This should not take more than 30 days. You may be asked to agree a longer period, but this must not be "grossly unfair".
The exact meaning of "procedure of acceptance or verification" probably will not become clear until a court case has gone as far as the Court of Appeal. Please let us know at firstname.lastname@example.org if you sight one of these in a contract.
We believe that publishing or broadcasting your work should constitute acceptance, whatever the contract says.
Once again: payment is still due 30 days after invoice or delivery unless such a "procedure" is specified in your contract with your client, and unless a longer period is specified therein.
If you just agreed on the phone "650 words by 4pm" then you have an oral contract, but it ain't specifying anything else.
The NUJ recommends
that when work has been commissioned and carried out
satisfactorily according to the brief, it should be paid for in full. If
publishers over-commission or change their minds, that should be their
problem. Many publishers, however, offer "kill fees" of 50% to 67%
in the hope you'll accept that, shut up and go away. Your having read
this far may suggest otherwise.
Repeating some of Note 2 in more normal English...
usually there is one of two stories to tell. Either:
- On 24/03/2013 you agree to do a piece of work - and you agree
then and there how much you will be paid. You deliver the work,
as agreed, on time, on 28/03/2013. So the clock starts ticking on
this, the second date. The payment is overdue 30 days later, which
is 27/04/2013. Or:
- On 24/03/2013 you agree to do a piece of work - and, say, you
agree that you'll let your client know later on what the expenses
are. You deliver the work, as agreed, on time, on 28/03/2013.
But this time the clock doesn't start ticking until the client knows
formally how much they owe. On Saturday 13/04/2013 you get around to
invoicing for the work and expenses. Allowing the usual two working
days for the post, your client is aware how much they owe you on the
Wednesday, 17/04/2005. The payment is overdue 30 days after that,
which is 18/05/2013.
Note that though this program knows about weekends,
it doesn't know about state holidays. If the due date is counted
from the date on which you sent an invoice, please adjust it if
So why do you need to tell this program when you agreed to
do the work, when both stories seem to ignore this date? Because
it determines which late payment regulations, if any, apply.
For example in the UK the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998
allowed you to claim interest, but no compensation, on contracts made after 01/11/1998
- though Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) were exempt up to 01/11/2000.
And remember that both these stories assume that your client
didn't persuade you to agree some other payment terms, or
www.payontime.co.uk government-sponsored advice site - registration now required
If this message doesn't go away, this may not work fully with your
computer & browser. Please try it anyway.|